Enter:
winner of many Academy awards, Oops, Filmfare awards for making funny noises in the class room, Oops, for creating cartoon (short and not so funny) against Maharashtra's high and mighty state government. The history is in the making on the internet (alive and being written and rewritten by the volunteers with some and some low level ineptitude more high handed bias. | This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. You can assist by editing it. (August 2011) |
 | This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. (Consider using more specific cleanup instructions.) Please help improve this article if you can. The talk page may contain suggestions. (August 2011) |
Prequel to Anna Hazare (Internet) History Exhibit A:
Activism
[edit] Anti-corruption protests in Maharashtra
In May 1997 Hazare protested against alleged malpractices in the purchase of powerlooms by the Vasantrao Naik Bhathya Vimukt Jhtra Governor P. C. Alexander.[35] ^ "Hazare trains guns on Gholap". Indian Express. 21 May 1997. Retrieved 8 April 2011. On 4 November 1997 Gholap filed a defamation suit against Hazare for accusing him of corruption. He was arrested in April 1998 and was released on a personal bond of
5,000 (US$100).[36] ^ "Hazare released on bond in Gholap case". Indian Express. 14 April 1998. Retrieved 8 April 2011. On 9 September 1998 Hazare was imprisoned in the Yerawada Jail to serve a three-month sentence mandated by the Mumbai Metropolitan Court.[16] ^ ab Gosling, David L. (2001). Religion and ecology in India and Southeast Asia. London: Routledge. pp. 64–6. ISBN 0-415-24031-X. Retrieved 20 August 2011. [37] ^ "Anna Hazare sentenced to three months imprisonment". Indian Express. 10 September 1998. Retrieved 8 April 2011. The sentencing caused leaders of all political parties except the BJP and the Shiv Sena came in support of him. [38] ^ "Hazare sentenced". Anna Hazare sentenced. Retrieved 20 August 2011.Later, due to public protests, the Government of Maharashtra ordered his release from the jail. After release, Hazare wrote a letter to then chief minister Manohar Joshi demanding Gholap's removal for his role in alleged malpractices in the Awami Merchant Bank.[39] ^ "Hazare wants Gholap sacked". Indian Express. 12 December 1998. Retrieved 8 April 2011. Gholap resigned from the cabinet on 27 April 1999.[40] ^ Marpakwar, Prafulla (28 April 1999). "Snap polls woke Rane up to sack Gholap". Indian Express. Retrieved 10 April 2011.In 2003 corruption charges were raised by Hazare against four NCP ministers of the Congress-NCP government.[41] ^ "Pawar-Hazare rivalry revived". The Statesman. 6 April 2011. Retrieved 8 April 2011. He started his fast unto death on 9 August 2003. He ended his fast on 17 August 2003 after then chief minister Sushil Kumar Shinde formed a one-man commission headed by the retired justice P. B. Sawant to probe his charges.[42] The P. B. Sawant commission report, submitted on 23 February 2005, indicted Sureshdada Jain, Nawab Malik, and Padmasinh Patil. The report exonerated Vijaykumar Gavit. Suresh Jain and Nawab Malik resigned from the cabinet in March 2005.[43] ^ "Nawab Malik is second NCP minister to quit". The Times of India. 11 March 2005. Retrieved 8 April 2011
Three trusts headed by Anna Hazare were also indicted in the P. B. Sawant commission report.
220,000 (US$4,180) spent by the Hind Swaraj Trust for Anna Hazare's birthday celebrations was concluded by the commission as illegal and amounting to a corrupt practice,[44] ^ ab Joshi, Poornima; Kavita Chowdhury and Sangeeth Sebastian Kurien (17 April 2011). "Congress continues to target Anna Hazare on Narendra Modi remark". India Today. Retrieved 11 June 2011. [45] ^ a b "Report: Justice P. B. Sawant Commission of Inquiry". Government of Maharashtra website. pp. 256–372. Retrieved 8 June 2011. though Abhay Firodia, an industrialist subsequently donated 248,000 (US$4,710) to the trust for that purpose.[46] ^ Damle, Manjiri Madhav (29 June 2004). "Trust funds used for Hazare's birthday: Jain". The Times of India. Retrieved 17 April 2011. The setting apart of 11 acres of its land by the trust in favour of the Zilla Parishad without obtaining permission from the charity commissioner was concluded as a case of maladministration. The commission also concluded that the maintenance of accounts of the Bhrashtachar Virodhi Janandolan Trust after 10 November 2001 had not been according to the rules and 46,374 (US$880) spent by the Sant Yadavbaba Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Trust for renovating a temple was in contravention to its object of imparting secular education.[44] ^ ab Joshi, Poornima; Kavita Chowdhury and Sangeeth Sebastian Kurien (17 April 2011). "Congress continues to target Anna Hazare on Narendra Modi remark". India Today. Retrieved 11 June 2011. [45] ^ ab"Report: Justice P. B. Sawant Commission of Inquiry". Government of Maharashtra website. pp. 256–372. Retrieved 8 June 2011.Exhibit B:
Right to Information movement
In the early 2000s Hazare led a movement in Maharashtra state which forced the state government to enact a revised Maharashtra Right to Information Act. This Act was later considered as the base document for the Right to Information Act 2005 (RTI), enacted by the Union Government. It also ensured that the President of India assented to this new Act.[47] ^ Florini, Ann. The Right to Know: Transparency for an Open World. New York: Columbia University Press. p. 24. ISBN 978-0-231-14158-1. Retrieved 20 August 2011.On 20 July 2006 the Union Cabinet amended the Right to Information Act 2005 to exclude the file noting by the government officials from its purview. Hazare began his fast unto death on 9 August 2006 in Alandi against the proposed amendment. He ended his fast on 19 August 2006, after the government agreed to change its earlier decision.[48] ^ "Anna Hazare calls off fast on RTI amendment". The Times of India. 19 August 2006. Retrieved 11 April 2011.
Exhibit C:
Regulation of Transfers and Prevention of Delay in Discharge of Official Duties Act
Before 2006 in the state of Maharashtra, even honest government officers were transferred to other places according to ministers wish. Sometimes within months of being posted to a place, whereas some corrupt and favoured officials were cozy in their postings for many years in some cases even for 10 to 20 years and since there was not any guideline or law many government officials were reluctant to process files that contained important public proposals and decisions. Anna fought hard for a law whereby a government servant must clear a file within a specified time and that transfers must take place only after three years. After many years of relentless efforts of Anna, finally on 25 May 2006 state government of Maharashtra issued a notification announcing that the execution of the special act, The Prevention of Delay in Discharge of Official Duties Act 2006, aimed at curbing the delay by its officers and employees in discharging their duties. This act provides for disciplinary action against officials who move files slowly and enables monitoring officials who stay too long in a post, or in a department, and for involvement in a corrupt nexus. Within this act, it is mandatory for the government to effect transfers of all government officers and employees, except Class IV workers, after the stipulated three years. Act also prevents the government from effecting frequent transfers of officers before the stipulated three-year tenure, except in case of emergency and under exceptional circumstances. Maharashtra is the first state in the country to have introduced such act.[25] However, like others, this law has also not been followed in its true spirit.[49] ^ Chavan, Prajakta (16 February 2011). "Practise existing laws first: Anna Hazare". Mumbai: The Hindustan Times. Retrieved 9 June 2011. [50] ^ Marpakwar, Prafulla (29 Jul 2010). "State all set to scrap MAT". Mumbai: The Times of India. Retrieved 9 June 2011.Exhibit D:
Campaign against liquor from food grains
Constitution of India Article 47 commits the State to raise the standard of living and improve public health, and prohibit the consumption of intoxicating drinks and drugs injurious to health.[51]^ Basu 2003, p. 459 [52] ^ Basu, Durga Das (2003). Shorter Constitution of India (13th ed.). Nagpur: Wadhwa & Co. p. 1972. ISBN 978-81-8038-206-2. [53] ^ ab"मद्यनिर्मितीला प्रोत्साहन देणारे धोरण घटनाबाह्य" (in Marathi).In 2007 Maharashtra Government rolled out the grain-based liquor policy aimed to encourage production of liquor from food grain in the light of the rising demand for spirit – used for industrial purposes and potable liquor and Issue 36 licenses for distilleries for making alcohol from food grains.[53] ^ ab"मद्यनिर्मितीला प्रोत्साहन देणारे धोरण घटनाबाह्य" (in Marathi).
Anna Hazare opposed the governments policy to promote making liquor from food grains in Maharashtra. He argued the government that Maharashtra is a food-deficit State and there was shortage of food grains and it is not logical to promote producing liquor from food grains.[54] ^ a b c "Maharashtra urged to scrap permits for grain-based distilleries, There is no law to scrap the licences, says Principal Secretary". The Hindu. 3 June 2010. Retrieved 11 June 2011. One of the State ministers Laxman Dhoble said in his speech that those opposing the decision to allow use of food grains for the production of liquor are anti-farmers and those people should be beaten up with sugarcane sticks.[55] ^ ढोंबळेंनी मागितली माफी Maharashtra Times(Marathi)4 Jan 2010, [56] ^ "Laxman Dhoble- "people should be beaten up with sugarcane sticks"". Youtube. 4 January 2010. Retrieved 17 August 2011. Hazare initiated fast at Shirdi, but on 21 March 2010 government promised to review the policy and Anna ended his 5 day long fast.[57] ^ "धान्यापासून दारू नाही!" (in Marathi). Maharashtra Times (shirdi). 21 Mar 2010. Retrieved 11 June 2011. But the government later granted 36 licences and grants of
10 (US$0.19) (per litre of alcohol) to politicians or their sons who were directly or indirectly engaged in making alcohol from foodgrains. Some of the main beneficiaries of these licences includes Amit and Dheeraj Deshmukh, sons of Union Heavy Industries Minister Vilasrao Deshmukh, Bharatiya Janata Party leader Gopinath Munde's daughter Pankaja Palwe and her husband Charudatta Palwe, sons-in-law of P.V. Narasimha Rao, Rajya Sabha MP Govindrao Adik.[54] ^ abc"Maharashtra urged to scrap permits for grain-based distilleries, There is no law to scrap the licences, says Principal Secretary". The Hindu. 3 June 2010. Retrieved 11 June 2011. [58] ^ "Liquor from food grains, leaves farmers in lurch". PUNE: e Sakal. 28 June 2010. Retrieved 11 June 2011. [59] ^ "Alcohol from grains uncorks deficit issue". Mumbai: DNA. 14 Dec 2009. Retrieved 11 June 2011. The government approved the proposal for food grain-based alcohol production in spite of stiff opposition from the planning and finance departments saying there is a huge demand in other countries for food grain made liquor in comparison with that of molasses.[60] ^ "HC says no to Anna's PIL on liquor production from foodgrains". Deccan Herald (Nagpur). 5 MAY 2011. Retrieved 11 June 2011 Anna filed a Public Interest Litigation against the Government of Maharashtra for allowing food-grains for manufacturing liquor in the Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court. On 20 August 2009 Maharashtra government stopped the policy. However, distilleries sanctioned before that date and those who started production within two years of sanction were entitled for subsidies.On 5 May 2011 court refused to hear a Public Interest Litigation saying "not before me, this is a court of law, not a court of justice" as a reason of not hearing the plea.[61] ^ Tare, Kiran (30 Mar 2010). "Liquor to ooze from chikoo, jambhul". Mumbai: DNA. Retrieved 11 June 2011. [62] ^ "HC bench says no to hear Anna plea on liquor production". The Economic Times (Mumbai). 5 MAY 2011. Retrieved 11 June 2011.One of Principal Secretary in Maharashtra state C.S. Sangeet Rao, enlighten that there is no law exists to scrap these licences as this is a government policy.[54]
The Circus is in town, Oops, city, Oops, Jantar Mantar, New Delhi, the Capital of India
Lokpal Bill movement
Main article: 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement
In 2011, Hazare initiated a Satyagraha movement for passing a stronger anti-corruption Lokpal (ombudsman) bill in the Indian Parliament as conceived in the Jan Lokpal Bill (People's Ombudsman Bill). The Jan Lokpal Bill was drafted earlier by N. Santosh Hegde, former justice of the Supreme Court of India and Lokayukta of Karnataka, Prashant Bhushan, a senior lawyer in the Supreme Court and Arvind Kejriwal, a social activist along with members of the India Against Corruption movement. This draft bill incorporated more stringent provisions and wider power to the Lokpal (Ombudsman) than the draft Lokpal bill prepared by the government in 2010.[63] These include placing "the Prime Minister within the ambit of the proposed lokpal’s powers".[64]Hunger strike in Delhi
 | Wikinews has related news: Anna Hazare begins "fast-unto-death" hunger strike to end corruption. |
The movement attracted attention in the media, and thousands of supporters. Almost 150 people reportedly joined Hazare in his fast.[68] Social activists, including Medha Patkar, Arvind Kejriwal, former IPS officer Kiran Bedi, and Jayaprakash Narayan lent their support to Hazare's hunger strike and anti-corruption campaign. People have shown support in internet social media such as Twitter and Facebook. In addition to spiritual leaders Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, Swami Ramdev, Swami Agnivesh and former Indian cricketer Kapil Dev, many celebrities showed their public support through Twitter.[69][70] Hazare decided that he would not allow any politician to sit with him in this movement. Politicians like Uma Bharti and Om Prakash Chautala were shooed away by the protesters when they came to visit the site where the protest was taking place.[71] On 6 April 2011 Sharad Pawar resigned from the group of ministers formed for reviewing the draft Lokpal bill 2010.[72]
Protests spread to Bangalore, Mumbai, Chennai, Ahmedabad, Guwahati, Shillong, Aizawl and a number of other cities in India.[73]
End of hunger strike after meeting demands
On 8 April 2011 the Government of India accepted all demands of the movement. On 9 April 2011 it issued a notification in the Gazette of India on formation of a joint committee. It accepted the formula that there be a politician Chairman and an activist, non-politician Co-Chairman. According to the notification, Pranab Mukherjee will be the Chairman of the draft committee while Shanti Bhushan will be the co-chairman. “The Joint Drafting Committee shall consist of five nominee ministers of the Government of India and five nominees of the civil society. The five nominee Ministers of the Government of India are Pranab Mukherjee, Union Minister of Finance, P. Chidambaram, Union Minister of Home Affairs, M. Veerappa Moily, Union Minister of Law and Justice, Kapil Sibal, Union Minister of Human Resource and Development and Minister of Communication and Information Technology and Salman Khursheed, Union Minister of Water Resources and Minister of Minority Affairs. The five nominees of the civil society are Anna Hazare, N. Santosh Hegde, Shanti Bhushan Senior Advocate, Prashant Bhushan, Advocate and Arvind Kejriwal.[74][75]On the morning of 9 April 2011 Hazare ended his 98-hour hunger strike. He addressed the people and set a deadline of 15 August 2011 to pass the Lokpal Bill in the Indian Parliament.
"Real fight begins now. We have a lot of struggle ahead of us in drafting the new legislation, We have shown the world in just five days that we are united for the cause of the nation. The youth power in this movement is a sign of hope."Anna Hazare said that if the bill does not pass he will call for a mass nation-wide agitation.[76][77] He called his movement as "second struggle for independence" and he will continue the fight.[78]
Differences with the government on draft bill
Anna Hazare and other civil society members decided to boycott the meeting of the joint Lokpal Bill drafting committee scheduled on 6 June 2011 in protest against the forcible eviction of Swami Ramdev and his followers by the Delhi Police from Ramlila Maidan on 5 June 2011, while they were on hunger strike against the issues of black money and corruption and doubting seriousness of the government in taking measures to eradicate corruption.[82]
On 6 June 2011, the members of the civil society of the joint Lokpal bill drafting committee in New Delhi sent a letter to Pranab Mukherjee, the chairman of the committee, explaining reasons for their absence at the meeting and also asked government to make its stand public on the contentious issues related to the proposed draft legislation. They also decided that the future meetings will be attended only if they were telecast live.[83] On 8 June 2011 at Rajghat, describing his movement as the second freedom struggle, Anna criticised the Government for trying to discredit the joint Lokpal Bill drafting committee and threatened to go on indefinite fast again from 16 August 2011 if the Lokpal Bill is not passed by then. He also criticised the Government for putting hurdles in the drafting of a strong Lokpal Bill and its attempts to malign the civil society members of the joint Lokpal panel.[84][85][86]
Indefinite fast
Within twenty four hours of cabinet's endorsement of a weak Lokpal Bill, over ten thousand peoples from across the country sent faxes directly to the government demanding a bill with stronger provisions.[90] The Mumbai Taxi Men’s Union, comprises over 30,000 taxi drivers have extended their full support to Hazare’s fast by keeping all taxis off the roads on 16 August 2011.[91] Lawyers of Allahabad High Court described Lokpal Bill proposed by the government as against the interest of the country and pledged their support to Hazare by hunger strike at Allahabad on 16 August 2011.[92] On 30 July 2011 Vishwa Hindu Parishad supported Hazare's indefinite fast by saying movement for an effective anti-corruption ombudsman needs the backing of people.[93]Why are you (government) sending the wrong draft? We have faith in Parliament. But first send the right draft, our agitation is against government, not Parliament. The government has overlooked many points. How will it fight corruption by excluding government employees, CBI and prime minister from the Lokpal's purview? We were told that both the drafts would be sent to the Cabinet. But only the government's draft was sent. This is a deceitful government. They are lying. How will they run the country? Now I have no trust in this government. If it is really serious about fighting corruption, why is it not bringing government employees and CBI under Lokpal?[89]
On 1 August, Public interest litigation was filed in the Supreme Court of India by Hemant Patil, a Maharashtra-based social worker and businessman, to restrain Hazare from going on his proposed indefinite fast. The petitioner demanded to prohibit the fast alleging that Hazare's demands are unconstitutional and amount to interference in legislative process.[94]
Arrest and aftermath
| Wikinews has related news: Anna Hazare to resume "fast-unto-death" hunger strike from August 16, 2011. |
Along with Hazare, other key members of the India Against Corruption movement including Arvind Kejriwal, Shanti Bhushan, Kiran Bedi and Manish Sisodia were also detained from different locations. It was reported that about 1,300 supporters were detained in Delhi.[99] Media also reported that the arrest sparked off protests with people courting arrests in different parts of the country. The opposition parties in the country came out against the arrest, likening the government action to the emergency imposed in the country in 1975. Both the houses of Parliament were adjourned over the issue.[100]
Eventually, after being kept in judicial detention for just four hours, he was released unconditionally without any bail bond by the magistrate on a request by the police, but Hazare refused to leave Tihar Jail.[101] He demanded an unconditional permission from the police to observe a fast at Ramlila Maidan (Ground) in support of the Jan Lokpal bill and refused to leave the jail.[102] Hazare continued his fast inside the jail and refused to leave the jail though the jail authorities had technically released him.[103]
After his arrest, Anna Hazare received support from people across the country. There were reports of "nearly 570 demonstrations and protests by Anna supporters across the country" against the government's imprisonment of Hazare and others.[64][104] Due to the nationwide protests of millions,[105] the government agreed to allow him to begin a public hunger strike of fifteen days.[106] After talks with public authorities, Hazare decided to hold his protest at Ramlila Maidan, New Delhi.[107] On 20 August 2011 Hazare "left the Tihar Jail for the Ramlila Grounds".[108] Hazare promised reporters "he would fight to the 'last breath' until the government gets his team's Jan Lokpal Bill passed in this session of Parliament, which ends on 8 September."[64]
Fast at Ramlila Maidan, New Delhi
He was admitted to Medanta Medicity, Gurgaon for post-fast care.[114] He had lost 7.5 kg[114] and was very dehydrated after the 288 hour long fast.[115]
I Am Anna Chant
Within a few days of Anna Hazare's first fast demanding a strong Lokpal (on 5 April 2011), supporters across various cities of India started a campaign known as "I Am Anna Hazare", which is similar to the "We Are All Khaled Said" campaign well known in the Egyptian uprising.[116] At during Anna Hazare's second fast, the topi, the cap which Anna Hazare became synonymous with, became almost a fashion statement.[117] Sales of the topis hit an all time high.[118] Kiran Bedi declared that the "I am Anna" topi should be used as a deterrence method whenever someone asked for a bribe. She went to say that the topi should be always kept in one's bag and whenever anybody ask for a bribe, the topi should be shown to them.[119]Fast on MMRDA ground
On 27 December 2011, Hazare began a 3 day hunger strike at MMRDA grounds, Bandra Kurla Complex in demand to a stronger version of the Lokpal bill than the is in debate in the Parliament of India.[120]Before reaching the venue, Anna payed his tributes to Mahatma Gandhi at Juhu Beach. On his way in a rally, which was joined by several thousand people,[120] he took two-and-half hours to reach the ground, passing through Santacruz, Tulip Star Hotel, Mithibai College, SV Road, Vile Parle, Khar and Bandra Highway.[121]
Reiterating Anna Hazare's position, a PIL filed against the fast was turned down by the Karnataka High Court. Anna Hazare's fast last only two days in place of three days because of his ill-health. However, his critics believe that since response to his three days fast was poor because of which he had to call off his fast.[122]
Electoral reform movement
In 2011, Anna Hazare demanded an amendment to the electoral law to incorporate the option of None of the above in the electronic voting machines during the Indian elections.[123][124] The "None of the above (NOTA)" is a ballot option that allows an electorate to indicate disapproval of all of the candidates in an electoral system, in case of non-availability of any candidate of his choice, as his Right to Reject. Soon, the Chief Election Commissioner of India Shahabuddin Yaqoob Quraishi supported Hazare's demand for the electoral reforms.[125]Protest against atrocities against Swami Ramdev and his supporters
On 8 June 2011, Anna Hazare and thousands of his supporters observed fast from 10 am to 6 pm at Rajghat to protest against the midnight crackdown of 5 June 2011 by the Delhi Police on Swami Ramdev’s fast at Ramlila Maidan, New Delhi. The fast was initially planned to be held at Jantar Mantar, but the venue was shifted after the denial of permission by the Delhi police.[84][126] Anna Hazare held the Prime Minister of India responsible for the atrocities[127] and termed the police action as a blot on humanity and an attempt to stifle democracy.[84] According to one of the Anna's young supporters, the large presence of youths in the protest was due to their support to his use of nonviolence means of protest similar to Gandhi.[128]Controversies and criticism
RSS Agent
Anna Hazare has often being criticized for being an agent of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh a right-wing Hindu body in India.[129] United Progressive Alliance,the present ruling government in India has seldom charged Hazare with it. According to Digvijay Singh a senior leader of the Indian National Congress the entire crusade of 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement is a process being planned by Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh in which Plan-A was Baba Ramdev while Plan-B was Anna Hazare. Their basic job was to disturb the national security of the country[130]. Further Digvijay Singh had charged Anna Hazare for having links with late Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh leader Nanaji Deshmukh[131] with whom he worked as a secretary.[132] However Anna has declined for having any such associations.Views on Narendra Modi
In a press conference in April 2011, Anna Hazare praised Narendra Modi, the chief minister of Gujarat for his efforts on rural development along with Nitish Kumar, chief minister of Bihar, saying that the same should be emulated by the chief ministers of all states.[133] Subsequently, Modi wrote an open letter to him, hailing him as a Gandhian and anti-corruption activist[134] while Digvijay Singh, the General Secretary of the Congress party, criticised him for his comment.[135] In May 2011, Hazare, during his visit to Gujarat, changed his view and criticised Modi for rampant corruption by Government officials in Gujarat. He urged Modi to appoint a Lokayukta in Gujarat. He also commented that the media had projected an incorrect image of Vibrant Gujarat, very different from the prevalent situation.[136]Fraud during fasts
A cardiologist from Pune, Abhijit Vaidya – founder of Arogya Sena, a non-governmental agency active in public health, disaster management and social campaigns – claimed that he was informed by the close associates of Anna Hazare during a fast in Ralegan-Siddhi, that he was given glucose and electrolyte solutions during a fast. Hazare and his associates refused to comment on the allegation.[137]Accusations of corruption
The government of the state of Maharashtra instituted a Commission of Inquiry under Justice PB Sawant in September 2003 to enquire into allegations of corruption against several people, including four ministers in the state as well as the "Hind Swaraj Trust" headed by Hazare. The Commission submitted its report on 22 February 2005 in which it indicted the Hind Swaraj Trust for corrupt practice of spending Rs. 2.20 lakhs of its funds on the birthday celebrations of Hazare.[138] Two days ahead of Hazare's proposed indefinite fast on 16 August 2011, the ruling party of India, the Indian National Congress, launched an attack on him alleging that "the moral core of Hazare has been ripped apart" by the Justice P B Sawant Commission.[139]In response to this allegaton, Hazare's lawyer Milind Pawar, claimed that the commission had remarked about "irregularities" in the accounts, but had not held him guilty of any "corrupt" practices. Pawar said that on 16 June 1998, a celebration was organised to facilitate Hazare on winning an award from a US based NGO and it coincided with his 61st birthday. The trust spent Rs 2.18 lakh for the function. Abhay Phirodia, a Pune-based industrialist, who took the initiative to organise this function donated an amount of Rs 2,48,950 to the trust by cheque soon after the function.[140]
Hazare himself responded to the allegation by daring the government to file a First Information Report (FIR) against him to prove the charges.[141]
Accusation of being anti-democratic and anti-dalit
An article written in The Telegraph (Kolkata) by writer and historian Ramchandra Guha state that that environmental journalist Mukul Sharma found that that Anna Hazare forced the Dalit families in Ralegan Siddhi to adopt a vegetarian diet, and that those who violated the decree were tied to a post and flogged.[142] Mukul Sharma also found that no panchayat elections have been held in the village for the past two decades, and that no campaigning was allowed during state and national elections, upon the instructions of Anna Hazare.[142]Dalit columnists like Chandrabhan Prasad have opined that the movement initiated by Anna Hazare against corruption and for the Jan Lokpal bill is taking us to a situation of rejecting representative democracy and also alleged that this movement is an upper-caste uprising against India's political democracy. He also claimed that the centralisation such huge powers in Lokapal, which is a non-elected entity will lead the democratic setup to a very dangerous situation.
Dalit activist Kancha Ilaiah also commented in a similar fashion, that "The Anna movement is an anti-social justice, manuvadi movement. The Dalits, tribals, OBCs and minorities have nothing to do with it. We oppose it."[143] Another activist Anoop Kheri claimed that "The language, symbols used by the movement clearly reflects its upper caste Hindu nature, a very rightwing Hindu patriotism is being used to get the entire country against corruption. And as a dalit, I have a problem with it."[143]
There was also an allegation that an RTI activist was denied permission to protest by having a fast-unto-death at Ralegan Siddhi, the grama sabha stating that the reason was that only Anna Hazare can hold such fasts in his village.[144]
During his protest against corruption, another activist, Udit Raj, who was denied permission to protest against Anna Hazare, warned that succumbing to Hazare's demands, which he claimed were against the parliamentary processes will set a dangerous trend rendering the backward classes more vulnerable, as such mass mobilisations coercing the government with a "set of solutions" against constitutional processes could also be used against affirmative action, and is a threat to democracy.[145] Later, it came to light that poor dalits had been paid money of up to
200 each, exploiting their desperation. The participants said that they were asked to shout slogans against Anna, although the organizers have denied it. Some protesters said that they had been told that it was a pro-Anna protest, but feel cheated after realising that it was against Anna hazare.[146]Accusation of being nonsecular
On 22 August 2011 writer-actor Arundhati Roy accused Hazare in a newspaper article of being nonsecular. She questioned his secular credentials pointing out Hazare's "support for Raj Thackeray's Marathi Manoos xenophobia and (has praised) the 'development model' of Gujarat's CM who oversaw the 2002 pogrom against Muslims". The website of the newspaper published many responses to her article and these were mostly critical of her views.[147] Activist Medha Patkar also strongly criticised Roy, saying that her views were misplaced.[148]Hazare has in the past stood in firm opposition to the Shiv Sena and BJP governments in Maharashtra. Activist and writer Asghar Ali Engineer in an EPW article on Communalism and Communal Violence reported,[149]
The Shiv Sena is also facing serious problems from the social activist Anna Hazare who has accused its ministers of corruption and demanded their resignation. The SS-BJP government is facing serious corruption charges and is greatly worried. The Anna Hazare movement began in late November when he went on fast against the corrupt practices of the Shiv Sena ministers. The BJP initially supported the Hazare movement and now its deputy chief minister Gopinath Munde is also under a cloud. Initially the Hazare movement had created a rift between the Shiv Sena and the BJP but with Gopinath Munde himself under a cloud, both may close ranks. The Anna Hazare movement has certainly posed a great challenge for the saffron government at the end of 1996.Hazare was accused of working for RSS and BJP's behest, and against Muslims by cleric Bukhari of the Jama Masjid. Bhukhari was subsequently criticised for being a Royal Imam and the communal comments being his personal views which did not represent the view of ordinary Muslims.[150]
Anna supports violence selectively
Hazare, who imitates Gandhi in dressing, acknowledged his belief in violence after his infamous remark "just one slap" in which the victim of violence was Sharad Pawar, a rival in maharashtra in terms of popularity. [151]Conspiracy to murder Hazare
Anna Hazare has exposed large corruption in co-operative sugar factories of Maharashtra. One of the sugar factories which Anna exposed corruption of is controlled by Dr.Padamsinh Bajirao Patil, a member of Parliament of 15th Lok Sabha and higher-ranking Leader of Nationalist Congress Party from Osmanabad, and also a prime accused and conspirator in the 2006 murder case of Indian National Congress leader Pawanraje Nimabalkar.[152][153]The conspiracy to kill Hazare was exposed when Parasmal Jain, an accused in the Nimbalkar murder case, in his written confession before a magistrate said that Padamsinh Bajirao Patil had paid a sum of
3,000,000 (US$57,000) to murder Nimbalkar, and also offered him supari (contract killing sum) to kill Anna Hazare.[154][155] After this written confession, Anna appealed to the state government of Maharashtra to lodge a separate First Information Report ( FIR ) against Padamsinh Bajirao Patil for conspiring to murder him but the government did not take any action in this regard. Anna Hazare decided to lodge a complaint himself and on 26 September 2009, he lodged complaint at Parner police station of Ahmednagar District in Maharashtra against the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) MP Padamsinha Patil for conspiring to eliminate him.[156] Padamsinh Patil approached the High Court seeking anticipatory bail but on 14 October 2009, the Aurangabad bench of Bombay High Court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Padamsinh Patil in connection with a complaint filed by Anna after observing that there is a prima facie evidence against him.[157][158]Padmasinh Patil appealed for an anticipatory bail in Supreme Court of India which the court rejected on 6 November 2009.[159] On 11 November 2009 Padmasinh Patil surrendered before the sessions court in Latur as per a directive of the Supreme Court and was sent to judicial remand for 14 days.[160] On 16 December 2009 Aurangabad bench of Bombay High Court granted bail to him.[161] As of 16 August 2011, the verdict is pending.
As of December 2011, Anna Hazare has got Z+ security. [162]
Obituary:
Anna Hazare (movement against corruption) is dead.
Long live Corruption
| |||
 | |||
| |||
|
|  |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
More
Anna Hazare is Dead: Sid Harth « My Sister Eileen: Sid Harth
mysistereileen.com/?p=1287Jul 29, 2011 – Death of a Stuntman, Anna Hazare: Sid Harth | My Sister Eileen … … Jun 27, 2011 – Starred results for @mysistereileen.com Anna Hazare Baba … ...
You shared this on Blogger · Oct 19, 2011 End of the World, Oops, Anna Hazare: Sid Harth « My Sister Eileen ...
mysistereileen.com/?p=2221Aug 24, 2011 – 23 hours ago – Death of a Stuntman, Anna Hazare: Sid Harth | My Sister Eileen: Sid … Jun 27, 2011 – Starred results for @mysistereileen.com ...
Devil-may-care: Sid Harth: End of the World, Oops, Anna Hazare ...
devilmaycaresidharth.blogspot.com/.../end-of-world-oops-anna-haza...Aug 21, 2011 – As thousands of people thronged Ramlila maidan to support Anna Hazare's crusade against corruption, it is brisk business for many selling ...You shared this Hindutva: Sid Harth: End of the World, Oops, Anna Hazare: Sid Harth
hindutvasidharth.blogspot.com/.../end-of-world-oops-anna-hazare-si...Aug 24, 2011 – 23 hours ago – Death of a Stuntman, Anna Hazare: Sid Harth | My Sister Eileen: Sid … Jun 27, 2011 – Starred results for @mysistereileen.com ...You shared this Sidharth the next Anna? | 2206124
www.india-forums.com › ... › Bigg Boss Season 5 Forum1 post - 1 author - Last post: Dec 1Looks like Sidharth is grooming up to becoming a mass influencer like Anna Hazare, after being successful at influencing the youth of India.Columns - Sidharth Bhatia - DNA
www.dnaindia.com › COLUMNSHOT TOPICS: KANIMOZHI | ANNA HAZARE | ... Sidharth Bhatia has been a journalist for over three decades in the print and electronic media. Starting as a ...Sidharth Bhatia | Deccan Chronicle
www.deccanchronicle.com › ColumnistsEveryone's invited to Anna theatre. Anyone watching the live television coverage of the one day fast of Anna Hazare on Sunday would have been struck by the ...Anna Hazare is Dead: Sid Harth « USA: News, Views and Reviews
cogitoergosumusa.com/?p=1338Jul 29, 2011 – 14 hours ago – Death of a Stuntman, Anna Hazare: Sid Harth | My Sister Eileen … … Jun 27, 2011 – Starred results for @mysistereileen.com ...End Of The World Oops Anna Hazare Sid Harth Devilmaycare ...
myiphone4greviews.info/reviews-end-of-the-world-oops-anna-hazar...reviews end of the world oops anna hazare sid harth devilmaycare.Cogito Ergo Sum: India's Superpower Euphoria: Sid Harth
gosumercogito.blogspot.com/.../indias-superpower-euphoria-sid-hart...2 days ago – Of Prince and a Pauper: Sid Harth « My Sister Eileen: Sid Harth ... Jun 27, 2011 – Jun 13, 2011 – Can Anna Hazare's Jan Lokpal Bill deter ...
Politics/Nation
29 Dec, 2011, 09.46AM IST, TNN
Rajya Sabha is lookng to join forces with Left, Right and allies to take on government on anti-corruption Bill
- Story
- Comments
NEW DELHI: BJP set its sights on confronting the government over the Lokpal and Lokayukta Bill, 2011 in the Rajya Sabha by looking to join forces with Leftand regional parties and declining the ruling coalition's overtures seeking support for the anti-corruption law.Finance minister Pranab Mukherjee held detailed discussions with leader of opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley over the vexatious provisions of the bill that deal with the setting up of Lokayuktas in states. BJP opposes the clauses on the grounds that they are unconstitutional and also because it seeks common ground with state outfits.
While Mukherjee spoke to BJP leaders at length, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh also called Jaitley to wish the BJP leader on his birthday and during the conversation mentioned that the government would welcome some assistance in the Upper House. The mention was in passing, but the Centre was keen to shore up its numbers.
BJP's opposition to the Lokayukta formulation saw it move closer to UPA partner Trinamool Congress who went back to a tough line on Lokayukta after having voted for the bill in the Lok Sabha. The regional party's leaders said they had not examined the bill's implication in full but now felt the facts had not been clearly understood.
Trinamool leaders met BJP as well as other parties like AIADMK. Now, both AIADMK and Trinamool have submitted amendments seeking deletion of the chapter on the Lokayukta.
"The amendments seek elimination of clauses 63 to 97," said well-placed sources. All opposition groups are keenly watching to see if Trinamool carries out its threat to virtually ensure defeat of the bill.
If the UPA partner does put its amendment to vote, it might be carried as opposition groups are expected to support the move although it will be interesting to see if the Left parties join in or use an escape route like an abstention. There is also a possibility, BJP sources admitted, that the anti-corruption bill might not be put to vote by the government if it senses a serious danger.
BJP is moving 21 amendments in all, including those on government control on the Central Bureau of Investigation and amending the Lokayukta formulation. The party is also seeking changes in the procedure to remove the Lokpal. Many of these amendments will be mirrored by those submitted by regional parties.
BJP feels that in case the bill does go through the Rajya Sabha, it can claim some credit for further amendments the government may accept even as it has joined hands with a slew of regional parties to move an amendment that seeks to refer the bill to a select committee. Most non-UPA parties and even a couple in the ruling coalition will find this to be an attractive idea.
While Mukherjee spoke to BJP leaders at length, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh also called Jaitley to wish the BJP leader on his birthday and during the conversation mentioned that the government would welcome some assistance in the Upper House. The mention was in passing, but the Centre was keen to shore up its numbers.
BJP's opposition to the Lokayukta formulation saw it move closer to UPA partner Trinamool Congress who went back to a tough line on Lokayukta after having voted for the bill in the Lok Sabha. The regional party's leaders said they had not examined the bill's implication in full but now felt the facts had not been clearly understood.
Trinamool leaders met BJP as well as other parties like AIADMK. Now, both AIADMK and Trinamool have submitted amendments seeking deletion of the chapter on the Lokayukta.
"The amendments seek elimination of clauses 63 to 97," said well-placed sources. All opposition groups are keenly watching to see if Trinamool carries out its threat to virtually ensure defeat of the bill.
If the UPA partner does put its amendment to vote, it might be carried as opposition groups are expected to support the move although it will be interesting to see if the Left parties join in or use an escape route like an abstention. There is also a possibility, BJP sources admitted, that the anti-corruption bill might not be put to vote by the government if it senses a serious danger.
BJP is moving 21 amendments in all, including those on government control on the Central Bureau of Investigation and amending the Lokayukta formulation. The party is also seeking changes in the procedure to remove the Lokpal. Many of these amendments will be mirrored by those submitted by regional parties.
BJP feels that in case the bill does go through the Rajya Sabha, it can claim some credit for further amendments the government may accept even as it has joined hands with a slew of regional parties to move an amendment that seeks to refer the bill to a select committee. Most non-UPA parties and even a couple in the ruling coalition will find this to be an attractive idea.
More stories from this edition of Lokpal Bill
For Politics/Nation news updates, follow ET on Twitter
PREVIOUS STORY
Lokpal and Lokayukta Bill, 2011: Joint sitting of Parliament in the works?
Lokpal and Lokayukta Bill, 2011: Joint sitting of Parliament in the works?
The Constitution has the provision of convening joint sitting of Parliament under Article 118 for passing any bill - other than a money bill or a constitution amendment bill - if it fails to get the Rajya Sabha's approval.
NEXT STORY
India, Japan move to end deadlock on N-deal
India, Japan move to end deadlock on N-deal
In November, New Delhi made a set of proposals to accommodate Japan's concerns on an agreement that is seen as being crucial for the development of India's civilian nuclear sector.
0 comments:
Post a Comment