Foreign Policy - the global magazine of economics, politics, and ideas
www.foreignpolicy.com/7 hours ago – Foreign Policy is a global magazine of politics, economics, and ideas.
You shared this on Blogger · Nov 13, 2011 Hi, my name's Dan, and I'm a RINO - Daniel Drezner - Foreign Policy
drezner.foreignpolicy.com/posts/.../hi_my_names_dan_and_im_a_ri...Nov 27, 2011 – I have a long essay in The Spectator (U.K.) on the state of foreign policy thinking among the GOP 2012 presidential candidates. Here's me not ...Marc Lynch | FOREIGN POLICY
lynch.foreignpolicy.com/2 days ago – In the meantime, you can always go back to Revolution in the Arab World, the eBook based on Foreign Policy articles, which I think remains an ...Cogito Ergo Sum: Foreign Policy and I
gosumercogito.blogspot.com/2011/11/foreign-policy-and-i_25.htmlNov 25, 2011 – Cogito Ergo Sum Home Hindutva: Sid Harth Hindutva: Sid Harth Friday, November 18, 2011 Foreign Policy and I Edition: U.S. My Account My ...You shared this Cogito Ergo Sum: Foreign Policy and I
gosumercogito.blogspot.com/2011/12/foreign-policy-and-i_208.htmlDec 3, 2011 – The essay is intended to survey existing scholarship on U.S. relations with Thailand, and to a lesser extent, American foreign policy elsewhere ...You shared this Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada (DFAIT)
www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/index.aspxForeign Affairs and International Trade Canada (DFAIT) supports Canadians abroad, works towards a more peaceful and secure world, and promotes our ...Ex-Aide: Ron Paul's Foreign Policy is 'Sheer Lunacy' - Jill Lawrence ...
www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/...foreign-policy.../250541/17 hours ago – A disillusioned former aide publishes scathing allegations, saying that Paul harbors anti-Israel views and is a 9/11 truther.Hope is Not a Foreign Policy
www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/Oct 30, 2011 – Provides conservative political commentary on a range of current events with an emphasis on U.S. foreign policy.Articles: Ron Paul's Foreign Policy Exposed
www.americanthinker.com/.../ron_pauls_foreign_policy_exposed.ht...Dec 19, 2011 – Much has been said against Ron Paul's foreign policy. He has been accused of anti-Semitism, of living in a pre-technological past, and of using ...The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy - Wikipedia, the free ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Israel_Lobby_and_U.S._Foreign_PolicyThe Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy is the title of a book by John Mearsheimer, Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago, and Stephen ...
Ad - Why this ad?
Search for :
Foreign policy isn't about good and evil
AP
Flags of United Nations, left, and South Korea flutter over the barbed-wire fence with the banners wishing for reunification of the two Koreas at the Imjingak Pavilion near the border village of the Panmunjom (DMZ) that separates the two Koreas since the Korean War, in Paju, north of Seoul, South Korea, Monday, Dec. 26, 2011. (AP Photo/ Lee Jin-man)
READER FEEDBACK
Post a comment By Gareth Evans Václav Havel, the Czech playwright and dissident turned president, and Kim Jong Il, the North Korean despot, might have lived on different planets, for all their common commitment to human dignity, rights, and democracy. When they died just a day apart this month, the contrast was hard for the global commentariat to resist: Prague's prince of light against Pyongyang's prince of darkness.
But it is worth remembering that Manichaean good-vs.-evil typecasting - the kind to which former President George W. Bush and former Prime Minister Tony Blair were famously prone, and of which we have had something of a resurgence in recent days - carries two big risks for international policymakers.
One risk is that it limits the options for dealing with those cast as irredeemably evil. The debacle of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq should have taught us the peril of talking only through the barrel of a gun to those whose behavior disgusts us.
Sometimes threats to a civilian population will be so acute and immediate as to make military intervention the only option, as with Moammar Gadhafi's planned assault on Benghazi. But more often it will be a matter of relying on less extreme measures, like targeted sanctions and threats of international prosecution, and on diplomatic pressure and persuasion.
Negotiating with the genocidal butchers of the Khmer Rouge was acutely troubling for those of us involved, but the talks secured a lasting peace in Cambodia. And it is only negotiation - albeit backed by good, old-fashioned containment and deterrence - that can deliver sustainable peace with Iran and North Korea.
The second risk of seeing the world in black and white is greater public cynicism, which makes ideals-based policy-making even harder. Expectations raised too high are bound to be disappointed: Think of former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook's "ethical foreign policy" at the start of Blair's premiership.
Political leaders who make much of "values" are often most likely to stumble. Think of the lamentable response by Bill Clinton's administration to the Rwandan genocide in 1994.
Then there is Western governments' highly selective embrace of democracy when it results in the election of those (like Hamas) they find unacceptable; the unwillingness of almost every nuclear state to match its disarmament rhetoric with credible action; and the almost universal double talk on climate change.
But if double talk were an indictable offense, there would be few left to attend international summits. The task is neither to pillory nor to sanctify political leaders caught in these traps, but to reconcile what they will often see as hopelessly competing demands of moral values and national interests, and to find ways to get them to do more good and less harm.
A useful way forward in this respect may be to fundamentally rethink the concept of "national interest." To its two traditional dimensions, economic and strategic, there is a strong case for adding a third: every country's interest in being, and being seen to be, a good international citizen.
Actively helping to solve global public-goods challenges (like climate change, human-rights protection, international piracy, drug trafficking, cross-border population flows, and the elimination of weapons of mass destruction), even when there is no direct economic or strategic payoff, is not simply the foreign-policy equivalent of Boy Scout good deeds. Selfless cooperation on these issues can actually work to a country's advantage by boosting its reputation and generating reciprocal support: My help in solving your drug-trafficking problem today will increase the chances of your supporting my asylum-seeker problem tomorrow. And a story couched in these realist terms is likely to be easier to sell to domestic constituencies than one pitched as disinterested altruism.
Countries should pursue what the great international-relations scholar Hedley Bull called "purposes beyond ourselves": Our common humanity demands no less. But the real world is a place of gray shades, not black and white, and more often than not, the cause of human decency and security will be better served by recognizing and working around that constraint rather than challenging it head on.
Gareth Evans is the chancellor of the Australian National University and a former Australian foreign minister.
But it is worth remembering that Manichaean good-vs.-evil typecasting - the kind to which former President George W. Bush and former Prime Minister Tony Blair were famously prone, and of which we have had something of a resurgence in recent days - carries two big risks for international policymakers.
One risk is that it limits the options for dealing with those cast as irredeemably evil. The debacle of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq should have taught us the peril of talking only through the barrel of a gun to those whose behavior disgusts us.
Sometimes threats to a civilian population will be so acute and immediate as to make military intervention the only option, as with Moammar Gadhafi's planned assault on Benghazi. But more often it will be a matter of relying on less extreme measures, like targeted sanctions and threats of international prosecution, and on diplomatic pressure and persuasion.
Negotiating with the genocidal butchers of the Khmer Rouge was acutely troubling for those of us involved, but the talks secured a lasting peace in Cambodia. And it is only negotiation - albeit backed by good, old-fashioned containment and deterrence - that can deliver sustainable peace with Iran and North Korea.
The second risk of seeing the world in black and white is greater public cynicism, which makes ideals-based policy-making even harder. Expectations raised too high are bound to be disappointed: Think of former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook's "ethical foreign policy" at the start of Blair's premiership.
Political leaders who make much of "values" are often most likely to stumble. Think of the lamentable response by Bill Clinton's administration to the Rwandan genocide in 1994.
Then there is Western governments' highly selective embrace of democracy when it results in the election of those (like Hamas) they find unacceptable; the unwillingness of almost every nuclear state to match its disarmament rhetoric with credible action; and the almost universal double talk on climate change.
But if double talk were an indictable offense, there would be few left to attend international summits. The task is neither to pillory nor to sanctify political leaders caught in these traps, but to reconcile what they will often see as hopelessly competing demands of moral values and national interests, and to find ways to get them to do more good and less harm.
A useful way forward in this respect may be to fundamentally rethink the concept of "national interest." To its two traditional dimensions, economic and strategic, there is a strong case for adding a third: every country's interest in being, and being seen to be, a good international citizen.
Actively helping to solve global public-goods challenges (like climate change, human-rights protection, international piracy, drug trafficking, cross-border population flows, and the elimination of weapons of mass destruction), even when there is no direct economic or strategic payoff, is not simply the foreign-policy equivalent of Boy Scout good deeds. Selfless cooperation on these issues can actually work to a country's advantage by boosting its reputation and generating reciprocal support: My help in solving your drug-trafficking problem today will increase the chances of your supporting my asylum-seeker problem tomorrow. And a story couched in these realist terms is likely to be easier to sell to domestic constituencies than one pitched as disinterested altruism.
Countries should pursue what the great international-relations scholar Hedley Bull called "purposes beyond ourselves": Our common humanity demands no less. But the real world is a place of gray shades, not black and white, and more often than not, the cause of human decency and security will be better served by recognizing and working around that constraint rather than challenging it head on.
Gareth Evans is the chancellor of the Australian National University and a former Australian foreign minister.
MORE FROM PHILLY.COM
MORE FROM THE WEB
All that wisdom in 500 and or less?
Gareth Evans, I am going to nominate you, before anybody else, including your mother-in-law for IgNobel Peace Prize.
May your tribe increase.
Get a haircut, Oops, salary cut before appearing in white (only tie and nothing else) dinner. Fig leaf, optional. No cameras, video cameras, listening devices, recording whirling dervishes, bag lunches, copies of National Inquirer, Oops, (Philadelphia) Inquirer, local and national historian, National, Oops, International Poet Laureate, barking and/or silent dog, sleepy (Tom) cat, a mice, Oops, mikes or two. No turtle, please. They serve turtle soup.
What rewards: Failed Doomsday Predictions, Beer-Loving Beetles, Effects of a Full Bladder on Decision-Making, The “Theory of Structured Procrastination”, and the Wasabi Fire Alarm?
Why, the IgNobel prizes do! The prizes that make you laugh, and then make you think. And then, maybe, become really useful. From the press release:
(September 29, 2011, CAMBRIDGE, MA, USA) The 2011 Ig Nobel Prizes, honoring achievements that first make people LAUGH, and then make them THINK, were awarded at Harvard University’s historic Sanders Theatre tonight before 1200 spectators in a ceremony filled with coffee, chemistry, opera singers, and paper airplanes. Around the world, thousands watched on YouTube. This was the 21th First Annual Ig Nobel Prize Ceremony.
Seven of the ten new winners journeyed to Harvard — at their own expense — to accept their Prizes.
The Ig Nobel Prizes were physically handed to the winners by seven genuine Nobel laureates: Dudley Herschbach (chemistry, 1986), Rich Roberts (physiology or medicine, 1993), Jack Szostak (physiology or medicine, 2009), Roy Glauber (physics, 2005), Eric Maskin (economics, 2007), Peter Diamond (economics, 2010) and Louis Ignarro (physiology or medicine, 1998). Professor Ignarro was also given away in the Win-a-Date-With-a-Nobel-Laureate Contest.
...and I am Sid Harth@sidileak.com
Gareth Evans, I am going to nominate you, before anybody else, including your mother-in-law for IgNobel Peace Prize.
May your tribe increase.
Get a haircut, Oops, salary cut before appearing in white (only tie and nothing else) dinner. Fig leaf, optional. No cameras, video cameras, listening devices, recording whirling dervishes, bag lunches, copies of National Inquirer, Oops, (Philadelphia) Inquirer, local and national historian, National, Oops, International Poet Laureate, barking and/or silent dog, sleepy (Tom) cat, a mice, Oops, mikes or two. No turtle, please. They serve turtle soup.
What rewards: Failed Doomsday Predictions, Beer-Loving Beetles, Effects of a Full Bladder on Decision-Making, The “Theory of Structured Procrastination”, and the Wasabi Fire Alarm?
Why, the IgNobel prizes do! The prizes that make you laugh, and then make you think. And then, maybe, become really useful. From the press release:
(September 29, 2011, CAMBRIDGE, MA, USA) The 2011 Ig Nobel Prizes, honoring achievements that first make people LAUGH, and then make them THINK, were awarded at Harvard University’s historic Sanders Theatre tonight before 1200 spectators in a ceremony filled with coffee, chemistry, opera singers, and paper airplanes. Around the world, thousands watched on YouTube. This was the 21th First Annual Ig Nobel Prize Ceremony.
Seven of the ten new winners journeyed to Harvard — at their own expense — to accept their Prizes.
The Ig Nobel Prizes were physically handed to the winners by seven genuine Nobel laureates: Dudley Herschbach (chemistry, 1986), Rich Roberts (physiology or medicine, 1993), Jack Szostak (physiology or medicine, 2009), Roy Glauber (physics, 2005), Eric Maskin (economics, 2007), Peter Diamond (economics, 2010) and Louis Ignarro (physiology or medicine, 1998). Professor Ignarro was also given away in the Win-a-Date-With-a-Nobel-Laureate Contest.
...and I am Sid Harth@sidileak.com
0 comments
Thank you for your comment. If you do not see it immediately, it is being routed for approval.
Submit another comment Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic.
If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" button.
If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" button.
More About Philly.com comments.
| Ads by Google |
| How to Buy Gold Physical Gold Shipped to Your Door Free Investor Kit. Since 1960. |
| Terrifying Brain Secret You must see this terrifying brain secret before it's too late... |
| Hotels in Philadelphia PA Over 8 hotels to choose from in and around Philadelphia. |
| 10 Stocks to Hold Forever Buy them, forget about them, and never sell them. |
| Laptop PCs Find Deals On Laptop Pcs Now. Get Holiday Specials Online Today! |
| See Thru Bikini See Thru Bikini - Deals! Save on See Thru Bikini |
- Viewed
- Shared
Philly.com Promotions
- News | Sports | Business | What's Happening | Restaurants & Food | Entertainment | Living | Marketplace | Jobs
Site Services:
Classifieds:
Partners:
Local Services:
