Tue, December 27, 2011
Foreign Policy - the global magazine of economics, politics, and ideas
www.foreignpolicy.com/Foreign Policy is a global magazine of politics, economics, and ideas.
You shared this on Blogger · Nov 13, 2011 Hi, my name's Dan, and I'm a RINO - Daniel Drezner - Foreign Policy
drezner.foreignpolicy.com/posts/.../hi_my_names_dan_and_im_a_ri...Nov 27, 2011 – I have a long essay in The Spectator (U.K.) on the state of foreign policy thinking among the GOP 2012 presidential candidates. Here's me not ...Marc Lynch | FOREIGN POLICY
lynch.foreignpolicy.com/6 hours ago – In the meantime, you can always go back to Revolution in the Arab World, the eBook based on Foreign Policy articles, which I think remains an ...
Cogito Ergo Sum: Foreign Policy and I
gosumercogito.blogspot.com/2011/12/foreign-policy-and-i_208.htmlDec 3, 2011 – The essay is intended to survey existing scholarship on U.S. relations with Thailand, and to a lesser extent, American foreign policy elsewhere ...You shared this Cogito Ergo Sum: Foreign Policy and I
gosumercogito.blogspot.com/2011/.../foreign-policy-and-i_7808.ht...Dec 7, 2011 – The bill would outlaw discussion with Iran about ways to end its nuclear program, even though this is a supposed aim of U.S. foreign policy. ...You shared this Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada (DFAIT)
www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/index.aspxForeign Affairs and International Trade Canada (DFAIT) supports Canadians abroad, works towards a more peaceful and secure world, and promotes our ...Ex-Aide: Ron Paul Foreign Policy is 'Sheer Lunacy' - Jill Lawrence ...
www.nationaljournal.com/.../ex-aide-ron-paul-foreign-policy-is-shee...10 hours ago – The Paul campaign calls Dondero a "disgruntled" former employee who was fired for performance reasons. But his allegations are getting wide ...Gingrich Criticizes Paul on Newsletters and Foreign Policy ...
thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/.../gingrich-criticizes-paul-on-newslette...3 days ago – Newt Gingrich raised questions about Ron Paul, hoping to slow the momentum that has helped him surpass Mr. Gingrich in some Iowa polls.Hope is Not a Foreign Policy
www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/Oct 30, 2011 – Provides conservative political commentary on a range of current events with an emphasis on U.S. foreign policy.LiveAtState: Internet Freedom and U.S. Foreign Policy
www.state.gov › ... › International Media Engagement › LiveAtStateDec 13, 2011 – LiveAtState: Internet Freedom and U.S. Foreign Policy.
Ad - Why this ad?
US Foreign Policy
www.fpa.orgLearn More From Free, Independent Articles & Free Online Newsletter!
The Faster Times is an independent collective of journalists and writers who are looking to create a new model for the newspaper. Please support our work without spending a cent by signing up for email delivery and "liking" us on Facebook.
The end of the war in Iraq demonstrates the success, and the ambiguous nature of that success, that has characterized much of President Barack Obama’s foreign policy. In some respects, the Obama administration has several substantial foreign policy accomplishments to which it can point on the eve of an election year. The capture and killing of Osama Bin Laden and winding down the war in Iraq are the most visible, but the administration has also responded effectively to some global events in places like North Africa and Russia wisely.
For example, the administration has avoided making too many strong statements about the current situation in Russia which would strengthen Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s narrative that the problem in Russia is excessive intervention by the American government, rather than excessive authoritarianism and election fraud by the Russian government. Similarly, although the Obama administration was, at times, frustratingly silent during the early days of the protests in Egypt, and displayed far more confidence than was deserved in the interest various North African autocrats held in reforming, the outcomes have been positive. In Egypt, President Hosni Mubarak resigned; and in Libya, Moammar Gaddafi was forced from office.
The problem the Obama administration faces, both politically and substantively, is that while it has numerous foreign policy accomplishments to which it can point, the whole to which they add up remains less than the sum of its parts. For example, while the killing of Bin Laden is something about which Americans are rightfully happy, and the conclusion of the military effort in Iraq, while almost a decade late and a few trillion dollars short, is also a good thing for the U.S., the overall impact these things have on American security, stability in South Asia or the Middle East or other related issues is less clear.
This is partially due to the vexing nature of these problems. The war in Iraq, for example, had created a range of problems that could not be easily solved by the U.S. beginning in 2009. Similarly, killing Bin Laden was never on its own going to eliminate the threat of Jihadist terror, but there are other factors to be considered as well. The Obama administration’s occasionally cautious approach to foreign policy necessitates downplaying both expectations and accomplishments. Thus, the absence of sweeping statements and ambitious goals can be frustrating to American audiences, but often lead to better outcomes.
On the other hand, this unwillingness to set ambitious or creative goals has contributed to the administration’s inability to consider bolder decisions and approaches. The killing of Bin Laden, for example, does not change the situation in Afghanistan where Obama has talked himself, and the country, into a war that continues with no clear end, or even goals, in sight. Similarly, the administration’s commitment to a U.S. position as a global hegemon spending billions of dollars it no longer has in this endeavor reflects a commitment to conventional, and increasingly unsustainable approaches to foreign policy.
In this context, the accomplishments of the Obama administration will never seem satisfactory, either to opponents of the administration who seek out any opportunity to criticize the president, but more significantly, to observers who cannot help but note the distressing state of international affairs despite several high profile success by the administration.
For Obama to craft a foreign policy that sews together his impressive accomplishments in a way that more concretely makes the U.S. stronger and more secure, the administration will have to demonstrate a willingness to move away from the received Washington wisdom and the logic of the foreign policy bureaucracy, and develop an approach to foreign policy that reflects the new fiscal realities at home and multi-lateral nature of the world today. This will not be easy, but if the U.S. does not do this, it’s role in the world will be reduced anyway, but definitively not on America’s terms.
Follow Lincoln on Twitter.
For example, the administration has avoided making too many strong statements about the current situation in Russia which would strengthen Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s narrative that the problem in Russia is excessive intervention by the American government, rather than excessive authoritarianism and election fraud by the Russian government. Similarly, although the Obama administration was, at times, frustratingly silent during the early days of the protests in Egypt, and displayed far more confidence than was deserved in the interest various North African autocrats held in reforming, the outcomes have been positive. In Egypt, President Hosni Mubarak resigned; and in Libya, Moammar Gaddafi was forced from office.
The problem the Obama administration faces, both politically and substantively, is that while it has numerous foreign policy accomplishments to which it can point, the whole to which they add up remains less than the sum of its parts. For example, while the killing of Bin Laden is something about which Americans are rightfully happy, and the conclusion of the military effort in Iraq, while almost a decade late and a few trillion dollars short, is also a good thing for the U.S., the overall impact these things have on American security, stability in South Asia or the Middle East or other related issues is less clear.
This is partially due to the vexing nature of these problems. The war in Iraq, for example, had created a range of problems that could not be easily solved by the U.S. beginning in 2009. Similarly, killing Bin Laden was never on its own going to eliminate the threat of Jihadist terror, but there are other factors to be considered as well. The Obama administration’s occasionally cautious approach to foreign policy necessitates downplaying both expectations and accomplishments. Thus, the absence of sweeping statements and ambitious goals can be frustrating to American audiences, but often lead to better outcomes.
On the other hand, this unwillingness to set ambitious or creative goals has contributed to the administration’s inability to consider bolder decisions and approaches. The killing of Bin Laden, for example, does not change the situation in Afghanistan where Obama has talked himself, and the country, into a war that continues with no clear end, or even goals, in sight. Similarly, the administration’s commitment to a U.S. position as a global hegemon spending billions of dollars it no longer has in this endeavor reflects a commitment to conventional, and increasingly unsustainable approaches to foreign policy.
In this context, the accomplishments of the Obama administration will never seem satisfactory, either to opponents of the administration who seek out any opportunity to criticize the president, but more significantly, to observers who cannot help but note the distressing state of international affairs despite several high profile success by the administration.
For Obama to craft a foreign policy that sews together his impressive accomplishments in a way that more concretely makes the U.S. stronger and more secure, the administration will have to demonstrate a willingness to move away from the received Washington wisdom and the logic of the foreign policy bureaucracy, and develop an approach to foreign policy that reflects the new fiscal realities at home and multi-lateral nature of the world today. This will not be easy, but if the U.S. does not do this, it’s role in the world will be reduced anyway, but definitively not on America’s terms.
Follow Lincoln on Twitter.
Lincoln A. Mitchell
Lincoln Mitchell joined Columbia University in January of 2006 as the Arnold A. Saltzman Assistant Professor in the Practice of International Politics. Before joining Columbia, Lincoln was a practitioner of political development and continues to work in that field now. His ...Read more about Lincoln A. Mitchell ->
More on these topics:
Afghanistan, Afghanistan War, Barack Obama, Egypt, Hosni Mubarak, Iraq War, Middle East, Moammar Gaddafi, North Africa, Obama administration, Osama Bin Laden, President Obama, Russia, South Asia, Vladimir Putin
Afghanistan, Afghanistan War, Barack Obama, Egypt, Hosni Mubarak, Iraq War, Middle East, Moammar Gaddafi, North Africa, Obama administration, Osama Bin Laden, President Obama, Russia, South Asia, Vladimir Putin
Showing 1 comments
SiDevilIamMy Dear Lincoln A Mitchell.I am Sid Harth.
As I remember, distinctly, even when I was totally inept and ignorant about such high-falutin terms as Foreign Policy, Life Insurance Policy, ditto for home, car, business, education, economic, internal, external, infernal policies.
Being of the nature, they call, Hawk Eye, I put together an (imaginary scenario).
Here is my final version of:
Foreign Policy of president of these United States of America vs my Mother's apple pie recipe.
Thesis summary:
My High School student adviser, MS Madeleine Albright wrote a, rather nasty note to my mother, contents are not to be disclosed till either MS Albright is dead and gone for good thirty years.
As I recall, it had something to do with some parts and some more parts of my scholastic (elastic) career. Suffice it to say, my dear mom did not raise me to be stupid and retaliated in kind. The word "kind," takes a meaning not currently accepted as God's kindness or my teacher is kind kind.
She was not illiterate and thus she preserved along with her summer garden fruit preserves her sense of diplomacy.
She made an (unofficial visit) to MS Madeleine and gave her hell. Not exactly hell hell but close to it. From that point in time, MS Albright left me alone.
Years later, I was reminiscing with MS Albright when she was in one of them State facilities for old, she paid high tributes to my mom's wisdom.
"Your mom, in few word, least words required to make a strong point taught me a lesson." she said in very polite tone.
"I can't believe, MS Albright that story. Are you pulling my legs?" I said.
"No my dearest favorite student. I am serious. Your mom asked me to make an apple pie. I did not know how to. She gave me her recipe. I still could not get it into an edible version, even when I tried all my culinary skills. Parts are parts and they cannot be made into an apple pie." She said.
The End.
...and I am Sid Harth@arabuhuru.org
Trackback URL
- "A story about art and collaboration, a story about youth and innocence, influence and homage. bit.ly/uKrU5X"
- "# NBA Thoughts and Predictions--let's argue. bit.ly/vgrceM"
- "For pleasurable reading and easy selection, we've compiled our film list links in one place. bit.ly/rFTI5A"
- "The Perfect Art: Reality Television and Polygamy bit.ly/vU2Q27 Is there value in self-deception?"
- Finally, “The Elements of Style” is a Rap Song
- Love Rescue Me
- Kristen Wiig is Nearly Nude as ‘GQ’’s ‘Bro of the Year’
- ‘Doctor Who’ Recap (Christmas Special 2011) – Tree Hugging
- NHL Picks (Tuesday 12/27): Habs Senators, Jets Avs
- Louis CK and the Future of Creative Control
- The Not So Secret Cult of the Far Too Violent Male: Thoughts on the...
- Angelina on “Danger Trip” to Cambodia: Maybe Cambodia Needs a New PR...
- What’s On Broadway
- Kepler-b22: NASA Discovers New and Possibly Hospitable Planet
...and I am Sid Harth@arabuhuru.org
0 comments:
Post a Comment