Friday, December 30, 2011

Filtered, Oops, Altered Photo (Opportunity)

December 28, 2011, 6:41 pm

From North Korea, an Altered Procession

By J. DAVID GOODMAN and DAVID FURST
Postscript | In addition to the European Pressphoto Agency, both Reuters and Agence-France Presse transmitted the altered photograph shown above, at right, on Wednesday. The original Lens post, below, should have noted that E.P.A. was not the only agency to release the image. Both Reuters and A.F.P. issued a kill on the image after the Lens post was published. “Reuters strongly suspects that this handout picture from K.C.N.A. was manipulated at source,” Reuters noted in a picture kill notice transmitted Wednesday evening. A.F.P. sent a mandatory kill statement over the wire on Thursday. “This picture was altered from the source and not by A.F.P.,” the statement read.

Correction appended | The funeral of Kim Jong-il on Wednesday called to mind the best stage-managed Communist state productions: the falling snow, the wailing mourners, the perfectly spaced limousines and rows of chest-beating men.
So perhaps it was because the scene was so nearly impeccable that someone — an overzealous North Korean photo editor? — appears to have taken issue with an errant group of men, barely noticeable in a sweeping photograph of the procession in central Pyongyang, and removed them.
According to an analysis by The New York Times and the digital forensics expert Hany Farid of Dartmouth College, a photograph distributed by North Korea’s state news agency and transmitted by the European Pressphoto Agency was altered using Photoshop to remove the men after the picture was shot.
Another photo, taken from the same high vantage over the funeral route only seconds earlier by Kyodo News, a Japanese agency, and distributed by The Associated Press, revealed the changes.
In the Kyodo photograph, which appeared in Wednesday’s Pictures of the Day, six men are standing near a camera behind the assembled crowds. In the North Korean photo, the men — as well as the camera and their tracks in the snow — are gone.
DESCRIPTIONAssociated Press, via Kyodo News; Korean Central News Agency, via European Pressphoto Agency
The time between the two photographs can be approximated by the position of the first limousine in the procession, which had moved roughly a car length in the time the two photographs were taken. (A red line was added to the photographs by The Times to highlight the movement.) Video of the procession broadcast on North Korean state television showed the cars traveling at a brisk walking pace when accompanied by the country’s new leader, Kim Jong-un, and other top officials, and more quickly when they are absent.
“Almost nothing changes,” Mr. Farid said in an interview. “Except where the men were standing.”
Mr. Farid, a computer science professor who specializes in digital photo analysis, said the manipulation was a simple matter of cutting out the men and cloning the nearby snow to mask the area where they stood. “It would have taken all of 30 seconds,” he said.
“But they were a little too quick in the cloning,” he added. “Some of the concrete is covered up by snow.”
Mr. Farid and photo editors at The Times focused on an area of concrete where the men are standing that is partially covered in the Japanese news agency photo. In the manipulated photo, the snow covers more of the concrete in precisely the area where the men had been pictured seconds before. Had they simply walked away — already highly unlikely given the time between the images — their tracks should have been visible in the snow, but they also disappear.
DESCRIPTIONAssociated Press, via Kyodo News; European Pressphoto Agency via Korean Central News Agency
Further manipulation can be seen around a row of what appear to be low, round bushes. A man stands near the top of the row, and the defined line of the last bush can be seen in a close-up of the image, below. In the North Korean news photograph, bottom, the man is gone and the line of the bush is blurry — a telltale sign of masking.
DESCRIPTIONAssociated Press, via Kyodo News; European Pressphoto Agency via Korean Central News Agency
The reason for doctoring the photo was not immediately known.
The European Pressphoto Agency did not respond to numerous phone calls. Just after 6 p.m., the agency issued a mandatory order, directing clients not to publish the photograph. “We have since been made aware that the image has been altered by the supplier, and the image was moved in error,” the notice said. “We apologize for any inconvenience.”
The North Korean photo briefly appeared on nytimes.com early Wednesday morning. The Associated Press noticed the disparity and contacted The Times. The photo was removed from The Times’s site.
In contrast to other recent notable examples of digital manipulation, like the 2008 addition of extra Iranian missiles in an altered photograph, the removal of six silhouetted men near the edge of the funeral procession appears to do little to change the content of the image.
A side-by-side comparison of the full images does point to a possibly banal explanation: totalitarian aesthetics. With the men straggling around the sidelines, a certain martial perfection is lost. Without the men, the tight black bands of the crowd on either side look railroad straight.
Perhaps it was a simple matter of one person gilding the lily.
Correction | An earlier version of this post misspelled the first name of Professor Farid. In addition, Dartmouth College was incorrectly referred to as Dartmouth University.

49 Comments

Share your thoughts.
    • Tom Carter
    • CHINA
     
    The West has been airbrushing photos for decades; DPRK gets hip to Photoshop and we feel the need to point fingers? Hypocrisy!
    • Dale Estey
    • Canada
     
    The attention spent to an altered photo seems much ado about nothing. Which prods me to point out that to use an inaccurate quote at the end of the piece cancels the whole point. "...gilding the lily" - though a common mistake - is a mistake indeed. Shakespeare wrote in The Life and Death of King John (Act IV, Scene ii). "To gild refined gold, to paint the Lily"
    • Haans Petruschke
    • Kirtland, Ohio
     
    Why is this any different from cropping a photo? Looking though photos associated with various stories in both NYTimes.com and the Associated press site, I see not all photos are the same aspect ratio. If this is done in camera or after the fact, it is still altering the image. Being so hypercritical demonstrates the hypocrisy of journalism. It is okay to omit information or alter or edit quotes for better readability even if this changes meaning. Why not a photo when meaning is not changed? Is it any wonder why journalists garner such low respect in our society.
    • Robin
    • Wild, Wonderful West Virginia
     
    'gilding the lily', what a wonderful turn of phrase to describe such a banal event.
  1.  
    What a waste of time.
    • Terrence K
    • Seattle WA
     
    Those who picked out. You are all right. The camera crews turned away while the car that's carrying Kim's picture was passing by. Sadly, concentration camp is waiting for those poor camera men.
    1.  
      That was my first reaction too. The camera is pointed in the "wrong" direction. I am sure the men will not be taking pictures or shooting video again for a long time.
    • jmcvey
    • Cambridge Mass
     
    to John in Napa: thanks for reminding me that advertisements are not news. The differences get blurry here, in the case of a staged state funeral, which is as much an advertisement as it is news (if not more so, depending on your perspective). It's the blurriness between categories that interests me. I'm bothered too by the holier-than-thou fingerpointing — and criticism of clumsy photoshop technique — that I find in this essay.
  2.  
    Love the analysis, also love the comments that question whether alteration is 'the norm' in photos.

    Seems to me the second shot, the altered one, is a wider angle shot with the cameramen removed, presumably the North Korean camera was at a slightly different height/distance. It would be interesting to see the location(s) of the cameras, were they on cherry pickers or on a building??
    • M
    • NYC
     
    It also looks like the altered image includes a column or pillar of some sort at the top left of the image, where in the original photograph there is nothing of the sort visible.
      • Lani
      • USA
       
      I suspect the column is visible in the altered photo because it is a wider/longer shot (note that it also captures many more buildings on the right of the photo than are seen in the AP photo).
  3.  
    A wider implications would be an allusion to
    Damnatio memoriae
    or this:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_of_images_in_the_Soviet_Union
  4.  
    For those who are typing "big deal," here's why The Associated Press brought it to The Times' attention: Manipulating images is against AP policy.

    http://www.ap.org/newsvalues/index.html

    "AP pictures must always tell the truth. We do not alter or digitally manipulate the content of a photograph in any way.

    "The content of a photograph must not be altered in Photoshop or by any other means. No element should be digitally added to or subtracted from any photograph. The faces or identities of individuals must not be obscured by Photoshop or any other editing tool. Only retouching or the use of the cloning tool to eliminate dust on camera sensors and scratches on scanned negatives or scanned prints are acceptable.

    "Minor adjustments in Photoshop are acceptable. These include cropping, dodging and burning, conversion into grayscale, and normal toning and color adjustments that should be limited to those minimally necessary for clear and accurate reproduction (analogous to the burning and dodging previously used in darkroom processing of images) and that restore the authentic nature of the photograph. Changes in density, contrast, color and saturation levels that substantially alter the original scene are not acceptable. Backgrounds should not be digitally blurred or eliminated by burning down or by aggressive toning. The removal of 'red eye' from photographs is not permissible."
      • Garbanzo
      • New York, NY
       
      Interesting that digital blurring of backgrounds is not acceptable, but if you do it optically with a lens, that's OK. Remind me again what the difference is if the end result is the same. Why should the reader care where technology is applied? Also, what about newfangled cameras that make such adjustments in the field before the digital image is stored. Is that OK? Seems like dancing on the head of a pin.
    • Nick Stratton
    • NJ
     
    Perhaps the reason why they are removed from the photo stems from the fact three of the people and the camera are turned away from the procession of kim jong il. Perhaps in a society which reveres and respects both kim jong il and kim il sung as practically (if not) gods this would be a sign of disrespect especially since its just as the procession reaches them.
    • NP
    • Brooklyn
     
    Great piece, NYT...North Korean Photo Hunt.
    • RL
    • CA
     
    The scene was already nearly perfect as state propaganda...so I go with aesthetics — totalitarian or otherwise — as an explanation. Unlike the Iranian missile launch image, the edits here don't really do anything other than "neaten up" the image. Overall contrast is increased to make the snow brighter, the crowd has been dodged to bring out some detail, and yes, color does appear to be slightly multiplied on the crowd and the flags. Nothing here that most publications wouldn't do, except perhaps deleting those stragglers.
    • Becky Driscoll
    • Santa Mira
     
    The Nazis, the Fascists, the Soviets and the Red Chinese loved their endless parades too, with lots of goose-stepping, grim Generals in greatcoats, and All Glory To The Maximum Leader/Murderer.
    • John Hoxie
    • Detroit, mi
     
    Can't believe you called this out. Seems infinitely unimportant. They just cleaned up the image for better presentation. Don't see any huge conspiracy here....and think there could be more important news to report.
    1.  
      it's just a blog post man, this is the LENS BLOG. can't the photographers and photo editors express their own opinions on issues? And who are you to judge?
    • jmcvey
    • Cambridge Mass
     
    And so the New York Times will, henceforth, publish no advertisements containing photographs that have been manipulated to make models thinner, products appear unblemished, etc.?
      • John
      • Napa, Ca
       
      Advertisements are not news. You should expect manipulation in ads that try to get you to want to buy the product advertised. That is what they are there for.
    • ZoetMB
    • New York
     
    So what? They didn't make the crowds bigger or add tanks or add fake images of people crying. The change in the photo didn't change the story. They could almost as easily simply been cropped out and no one ever complains about cropping.

    This is much ado about nothing. Because of abuses, we've become over-paranoid about Photoshop use, but even before the age of digital photography, news images were frequently airbrushed or otherwise manipulated.
    • hartman john
    • east of eden
     
    One wonders how many political photos of various US eminences have been altered, and why? Who really cares about this?
    • DM
    • NYC
     
    This is not the only edit I see. In addition to making the men on the left disappear, the photo editor made the snow in the field on the right more pristine, and covered up some thawed areas to the left of the building in the back with snow.
    • Marc B
    • Brooklyn
     
    The camera is pointing away from the procession. Perhaps it was removed because it is not directed where it should be according to the North Korean editors.
    • Denis C.
    • Montreal, QC
     
    It is also much clearer, no? Giving the picture a much less somber (not to say oppresive) look...
  5.  
    While we single out Iran and North Korea as Photoshop adepts, let's not forget the Ultra-Orthodox Jewish press right here in NYC.

    Ultra-Orthodox Paper Erases Hillary Clinton From Iconic Situation Room Photo
    May 9, 2011
    http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/05/09/ultra-orthodox-paper-erases-hilla...
    1.  
      well there is a difference. The photos that we saw from Iran and NKorea from issued from their state news agency. That paper in NYC is just a local small paper. Both need to be condemned.
    • Chris Word
    • San Francisco CA
     
    I think the issue, given some time to check out the un-doctored photo, is why is a camera crew shooting in the wrong direction just as the motorcade and parade are passing by? I'm sure there are probably other cameras on that strip of the motorcade...right? Given all the propaganda by their central government, shouldn't all the cameras be pointed in the direction of the parade, covering it? I wonder if the camera is broken down, or what's more important in the direction it's pointing.
  6.  
    "According to an analysis by The New York Times and the digital forensics expert Hamy Farid of Dartmouth University..."

    That should be Hany Farid of Dartmouth College. (http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/farid/Hany_Farid/Home.html)
...and I am Sid Harth@sidileaks.com

0 comments:

Post a Comment